The tragic and immensely heartbreaking suicide of 34-year-old Bengaluru techie, Atul Subhashhas left many people shocked and asking questions. According to the reports presented by various online sources, on December 9, Atul ended his life, leaving behind a 24-page suicide note and a video. In these, he accused his wife, Nikita Singhaniaand her family of harassment, extortion, and filing false cases against him.
A troubled marriage
According to the reports, Atul married Nikita in 2019 and had a son. However, their relationship deteriorated over the years, leading to significant disputes. According to Atul’s family, the problems worsened when Nikita and her family allegedly demanded large amounts of money.
According to the reports, in his suicide note, Atul highlighted that Nikita and her family asked for ₹3 crore to settle legal disputes and another ₹30 lakh to let him meet his four-year-old son. Although Atul was paying ₹2 lakh every month for his son’s expenses, he said he was still not allowed to see his child. He felt his son was being used as a way to force him to pay more money.
Poll
Should harassment and extortion accusations be investigated?
Dreadful claims of harassment and false cases
Atul’s family filed a complaint accusing Nikita, her mother Nisha, her brother Anurag, and her uncle Sushil of harassing him. According to Atul, Nikita and her family filed several false cases against him, including allegations of domestic violence, dowry harassment, and even attempted murder.
Atul wrote that during court hearings, Nikita mocked him and even told him to kill himself. He said this made him feel immensely helpless and pushed him to take this extreme step.
Allegations of judicial corruption
Atul’s note didn’t just blame his wife and her family; it also accused the legal system of failing him. He wrote that a judge in Uttar Pradesh’s family court was biased and ignored his side of the story.
According to various online media sources, he claimed that when he stood against the money demands in court, the judge disregarded him, saying, “She’s your wife; this is normal.” Atul also claimed that a court officer openly accepted bribes in front of the judge, further intensifying his frustration and immense restlessness.
His final plea
As per the sources, before taking his life, Atul recorded a video in which he spoke about the immense stress he was under due to the legal fights and harassment. Holding a sign that read, “Justice is Due,” Atul said he felt trapped and could no longer handle the pressure.
In the video, he asked for custody of his son to be given to his parents and requested that his ashes not be immersed until justice was served. Atul was later found hanging in his Bengaluru apartment on December 9.
Public outrage and the role of Nikita Singhania
Atul’s death has visibly sparked anger on social media, with people calling for justice under hashtags like #JusticeForAtulSubhash and #MenToo. Many activists as well as lawyers have highlighted how laws meant to protect women are sometimes significantly misused, causing harm to men like Atul.
Nikita, along with her mother, brother, and uncle, has been named in an FIR for provoking someone to commit suicide. The investigation into these allegations is in action.
What happens next?
The case has drawn attention to the struggles men face in legal disputes, especially in such family matters. Atul’s family is demanding justice, not only against Nikita and her family but also from the legal system that they believe let him down.
Atul Subhash’s tragic death has raised pressing questions about the fairness of family disputes in India and the potential misuse of protective laws. His story, filled with allegations of harassment, extortion, and judicial bias, underscores the urgent need to address gender-neutral concerns in legal processes. The incident has reignited debates about the balance between protecting women’s rights and preventing misuse of laws against men, highlighting the vulnerabilities some men face in such situations. As investigations continue, Atul’s family and supporters are advocating for accountability from both Nikita’s family and the judicial system. His final plea for justice resonates as a call for reforms ensuring equitable treatment for all, irrespective of gender.
Atul Subhash’s tragic story serves as a sobering reminder of the complexities and vulnerabilities within India’s legal and familial systems. His death has not only sparked a wave of public outrage but has also brought to light the urgent need for more comprehensive reforms to address the misuse of protective laws. Advocates for gender neutrality argue for balanced legislation that protects both men and women from harassment and exploitation in family disputes. The case continues to attract nationwide attention, urging society and lawmakers to consider the emotional and legal struggles faced by men in similar predicaments, demanding justice and systemic change.